Quick Switch Disc Golf Retriever Weight
I recently made a system for quickly switching my disc golf retreiver accessories (link). My Rogue Iron retreiver seems strong and I’ve never had issues with it - but I have seen other retrievers break before. I wanted to run some numbers and see how much extra stress I may be putting on my retriever with my change.
I started by weighing each of my retriever accessories. I weighed the wingnut which comes with the RogueIron accessories to compare:
| Base Weight | With Wingnut | |
| Single Hook | 9.8g | 13g | 
| Double Hook | 24.8g | 28g | 
| Mailbox Slot | 63.8g | 67g | 
| SuctionCup Ball | 63g | 66.2g | 
When I made my accessory adapters I made each one a different length (weight). I weighed each adapter I had made

| Shortest | Medium-Short | Medium-Long | Long | |
| Adapter Weight | 4.6g | 7g | 10.4g | 30.7g | 
From there I calculated the weight of each accessory using the shortest and longest of the adapters:
| Base Weight | With Wingnut | With shortest adapter | With longest adapter | |
| Single Hook | 9.8g | 13g | 17.6g | 43.7g | 
| Double Hook | 24.8g | 28g | 32.6g | 58.7g | 
| Mailbox Slot | 63.8g | 67g | 71.6g | 97.7g | 
| Suctioncup Ball | 63g | 66.2g | 70.8g | 96.9g | 
I also need to add the added weight of the adapter I put on the retriever itself.
My original retriever modification was permanent unfortunately. However - this means I removed 2.4g from the original retriever before adding 15.6g (+13.2g).
 The part on the left is what I cut off of the original RogueIron retriever. The part on the right is what I added by cross-drilling a hole and pinning with a cotter pin.
    
        The part on the left is what I cut off of the original RogueIron retriever. The part on the right is what I added by cross-drilling a hole and pinning with a cotter pin.
    
 
This gave me some final results on how much each accessory might weigh with with the heavier (non-destructive-install) retriever adapter. For this I only worried about my shortest and longest accessory adapters.
| Short Adapter | Long Adapter | |
| Single Hook | 40.3g | 66.4g | 
| Double Hook | 55.3g | 81.4g | 
| Mailbox Slot | 94.3g | 120.4g | 
| Suction Cup Ball | 93.5 | 119.6g | 
Seeing over 100g does have me slightly worried about the health of my retriever. A typical disc golf disc weighs around 170g. So I wanted to see how much relative weight increase each accessory might cause.
| Short Adapter | Long Adapter | |
| Single Hook | 23.71% | 39.06% | 
| Double Hook | 32.53% | 47.88% | 
| Mailbox Slot | 55.47% | 70.82% | 
| Suctioncup Ball | 55.00% | 70.35% | 
The heaviest accessory (mailbox slot) with the heaviest adapter (the long one I use on the suction cup ball in the above images) means the retriever will have 71% more weight on the tip that with just a disc. Putting the accessory an extra 6” further out has some reach advantages - but does make me worry about the force being even higher for the retriever.
On the other hand. When my retriever is at its fullest length I almost never need to fully support the disc’s weight. I usually will only need to drag it closer into 10’ range where I use the accessory to actually pick up or fling the disc to me.